%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SEV344^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n045.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 14:57:04 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 24.65s
% Output   : FiniteModel 24.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEV344^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n045.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 00:19:49 CST 2017
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 24.65/15.05  Nitpicking formula...
% 24.65/15.05  Timestamp: 00:19:58
% 24.65/15.05  The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 24.65/15.05  able to skip some scopes
% 24.65/15.05  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 24.65/15.05  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 24.65/15.05  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 24.65/15.05    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 24.65/15.05    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 24.65/15.05    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 24.65/15.05    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 24.65/15.05    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 24.65/15.05  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 24.65/15.05  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 24.65/15.05  
% 24.65/15.05    Constants:
% 24.65/15.05      bnd_cGVB_DISJOINT =
% 24.65/15.05        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.65/15.05        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False),
% 24.65/15.05         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))
% 24.65/15.05      bnd_cGVB_IN =
% 24.65/15.05        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.65/15.05        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False),
% 24.65/15.05         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))
% 24.65/15.05      bnd_cGVB_M = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 24.65/15.05      bnd_cGVB_ZERO = i1
% 24.65/15.05      bnd_x = i2
% 24.65/15.05  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 24.65/15.05  Total time: 3.8 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------